I was wrong. I was always of the philosophy that a calorie was a calorie was a calorie. That obesity was based upon a simple formula:
weight change = [calories in] – [calories out]
In other words, if you spent more calories than you consumed, you lost weight. If you consumed more calories than you spent, you gained weight.
However, a recent study published in the Journal of Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior suggests that all calories are not created equal.

All calories may not be created equal
The authors fed three groups of rats: one group was given regular chow ad lib. The second group was given regular chow ad lib and supplemented with sucrose. The third group was given regular chow ad lib and supplemented with high fructose corn syrup (HFCS). Although the overall number of calories consumed by the sucrose group and the HFCS groups were the same, the HFCS group gained significantly more weight.
It gets even more interesting. Fructose, on a per calorie basis, is much sweeter than sucrose. That is why it has replaced sugar in many food items, particularly soft drinks. The manufacturer can maintain the sweetness of the product while including fewer calories – tastes great and less filling, or at least fewer calories.
In the current study, however, the sucrose and the HFCS group consumed a similar number of calories overall. But the HFCS group actually obtained a smaller percentage of their calories from the corn syrup. The study suggests that the HCFS was able to drive more calories towards becoming fat than sucrose, even when HCFS made up a lower percentage of the total caloric intake.
Actually, this does make sense from a biochemical standpoint. Fructose is not like the other sugars common in our diet. Nicholas J Krilanovich described it nicely in a letter to the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition:
Basic biochemistry indicates that glucose and fructose have different chemical properties. Of the 3 major sugars that digest into the human bloodstream, the 2 that are vital to humans, galactose and glucose, are both aldoses, whereas fructose is a ketose—this sugar is the one that the human liver tries hard to keep at essentially a zero concentration in the blood. Murray et al (10) wrote that, “Biomedically, glucose is the most important monosaccharide and ingestion of large quantities of fructose has profound metabolic consequences …because it bypasses the regulatory step catalyzed by phosphofructokinase. This allows fructose to flood the pathways in the liver, leading to enhanced fatty acid synthesis, increased esterification of fatty acids, and increased VLDL secretion, which may raise serum triacylglycerols and ultimately raise LDL cholesterol concentrations.”
I am definitely going to pay more attention to the amount of HFCS I consume. Perhaps, my math has been wrong all along. I all likelyhood:
weight change does not equal [calories in] – [calories out]